Kef ls50 vs. The LS50 is sleek, modern, and out of this world.

Kef ls50 vs Both speakers have a rich history and are revered by audiophiles around the world. That being the Ascend Sierra-2EX, Kef LS50 Metas, Philharmonic BMR and the Kef R3s. May 19, 2023 · When it comes to high-fidelity audio reproduction, the battle between two iconic speakers, the KEF LS50 Meta and the LS3/5a, takes center stage. 3 x 15. Its body is 9mm wider, 55mm taller and 25mm deeper than KEF LS50 Meta. 0 x 212. The LS50 seemed somewhat harsh compared to the Calinda. 0mm ( 11-15/16 x 7. they did seem to improve with break in. 3mm ( 10. 1 set up. 0mm ( 35-3/16 x 11-5/8 x 12-5/16inch) whereas KEF LS50 has external dimensions of 302. As volume increases, R3's are noticeably more musical. With a minimum frequency of 45Hz, the LS50 Wireless II can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the The Fives's min frequency of 50Hz. Nov 25, 2019 · KEF LS50 vs R3 Round 2 (With EQ) Alright gentlemen, I stand by this review comparing the LS50 and R3 without EQ but since then ASR has measured the R3 I've really been wanting to try them again and experiment with some Parametric EQ and I recently bought a pair to get some more time with them. The LS50 simply doesn’t reach low enough (especially not at higher leve Jun 19, 2007 · Released to coincide with and celebrate KEF's 50th anniversary, the KEF LS50 Black Edition Mini Monitor Speakers take all of the same impressive technology that can be found within their predecessor, then they add a touch of style and class with the completely jet black design. Of the many speakers that they have to offer- two stands out without a question. Oct 20, 2019 · LS50 vs LS50 Meta without EQ: This was a quick and easy comparison, they sounded exactly like they measured. Below you can see the front view size comparison of KEF LS50 and KEF Q350 in scale. They might look the same as their predecessors Some people make a strong case for LS50 Metas with sub (or the prior LS50's with sub) because the LS50 Metas have been optimized for midrange whereas R3's have a slight tradeoff in midrange performance to get lower deeper bass. Try to listen to them really loud, I was so disappointed in LS50, they have this congested mids when it gets loud. LS50 metas are much more aesthetically pleasing though, imo. 5inch) whereas KEF LS50 Meta has external dimensions of 303. Its body is 45mm wider, 37. EACH with a matching Center. Featuring KEF’s signature Uni-Q driver array, the LS50 Wireless II delivers an incredibly coherent and KEF Q350 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Dec 12, 2004 · B&W formation duo vs KEF LS50 Wireless II 戴着APM云试听两者，音质觉得前者更好，但是音染也多一些，formation duo 低频比LS50wII好很多。 后者中频更好，声音更自然，价格好一些，低频很一般，如果加上KC62 需要考虑客厅位置摆放。 Nov 12, 2024 · As of 10 Dec 2024, experts prefer Kef LS50 over Edifier R1280T, but both Speakers have solid expert endorsements. The sound they produce is amazing and there's no contest with my previous set up. In this in-depth comparison, we explore the nuances of two highly acclaimed bookshelf speakers: the Monitor Audio Silver 100 7G and the KEF LS50 Meta. In this section, we are going to compare KEF Q550's and KEF LS50's external dimensions. (without stands), is an astonishingly good speaker for its price. Either the KEF LS50 or R3 can be an exceptional choice to bring professional-level audio to a home entertainment space. To go beyond, and thus, Meta. Here is a comparison of how Sonos Five and LS50 Wireless II's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Powered Bookshelf class. KEF has been one of the brands that have kept up with its quality of speakers over the years and has not disappointed its consumers. Dynaudio Focus 10 is 20mm narrower and 61. RE: performance in a bookshelf and without a subwoofer. The Kef ls50 Meta alone cant play bass att higher levels. If I use the integrated as a preamp, for room correction only, there will be an extra digital -> analog -> digital step. KEF Q550 has external dimensions of 894. 0mm ( 12-1/8 x 8-1/8 x 12-5/16inch) whereas KEF LS50 Meta has external dimensions of 303. Subs to be not locatable are generally crossed over at about 80Hz. 1) The app has not caused me any problems, much more stable as the original app was so unstable 2) The high frequencies are sooo smooth that the speaker sounds different, and better. The Fives has a frequency range of 50-25k Hz whereas LS50 Wireless II has a frequency range of 45-28k Hz. 8mm taller and 142. But you mentioned you want to use it as a 2. The benefits vs the LS50 Meta are 1) room correction, 2) active crossovers and 3) bass extension. KEF LS50 Wireless II is clearly the larger of the two speakers. First, let’s revisit the pre-Meta original. 0 x 201. I have a chance to get a pair of KEF Q750 for around $800, already get a pair of ls50 meta + stand for around $1500 and it's not shipped yet. i do like the Ls50's better the big Mar 14, 2020 · The LS50 also did not have the bass extension of the KEF Calinda. With a minimum frequency of 46Hz, the Borea BR03 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the LS50's min frequency of 79Hz. KEF LS60 Wireless has external dimensions of 1090. 875 x 11-1/16inch) . Oct 5, 2024 · The KEF LS50 (see image) is the bigger, heavier, and pricier of the two. 0 x 207. KEF LS50C Meta has external dimensions of 301. Sep 1, 2024 · This novel tweeter design earned the LS50 over 50 prestigious international awards and brought KEF to worldwide prominence. GoldenEar BRX has external dimensions of 308. At low to low-medium volume, not much difference between R3's and LS50 metas. 2 mains, Richter Thor IV sub Aug 4, 2017 · That was my impression of the LS50: a somewhat hyped treble (which is what "detailed" usually means). May 30, 2023 · Both the KEF LSX II and LS50 Wireless II boast a sleek and modern design that seamlessly integrates into any living space. KEF R3 Meta has external dimensions of 423. With a minimum frequency of 51Hz, the Q150 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the LS50's min frequency of 79Hz. 1 inch) whereas KEF LS50 Meta has external dimensions of 303. KEF LS60 Wireless is clearly the larger Frequency Response. Dec 8, 2004 · I switched from the passive kef ls50 to the wireless kef ls50. At 200Hz they struggle and defy the purpose of not being able to be locatable. The R3 might have a shot competing with similarly priced Genelecs, but not if you are looking for compact performance or an active speaker because the R3 is a large bookshelf. 6875inch) . The KEF R300, simply put, is lively, lovely, and refined. Comparison image of KEF LS50 and KEF Q350 Size and External Dimensions In this section, we are going to compare KEF LS60 Wireless's and KEF LS50 Meta's external dimensions. Usually, anniversary models are large, floorstanding "statement" designs with a price to match, but the LS50 was a minimonitor, priced at $1500/pair. KEF LSX II has external dimensions of 240 × 155 × 180 mm ( 9. The build quality is very high, fit and finish is incredible at this price point. Which, in your opinion, would be the best choice? LS3/5a : I must admit that the 'pride of ownership' of these classics appeals to me, much in the way that my owning a Fisher 400 and Thorens TD-124 TL;DR - KEF Q150 vs KEF LS50 Meta - I'm curious about opinions from those who have heard/owned both speakers, esp. 2, but both Speakers have solid expert endorsements. KEF Q350 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. With a minimum frequency of 51Hz, the Q150 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the LS50 Meta's min frequency of 79Hz. In this article, we delve into the details, comparing their design, sound quality, and overall performance, to help … KEF LS50 Meta vs LS3/5a: A Clash of Audiophile B&W 706 S3 vs KEF LS50 Meta Speaker Comparison In this review, we will be comparing 706 S3 and LS50 Meta, two Passive Bookshelf speakers from Bowers Wilkins and KEF . KEF LS60 Wireless is clearly the larger of the two speakers. This is reflected in the measurements and my personal experience. The LSX II is a compact bookshelf speaker, while the LS50 Wireless II features a slightly larger footprint. It's a pair of wireless stereo speakers packed with built-in amplification and streaming smarts, and their impressive execution of this appealing concept earned them a five-star review and a What Hi-Fi? Sep 15, 2020 · Verdict: KEF R300 vs LS50. Dec 16, 2020 · KEF's LS50 loudspeaker was introduced in 2012 to celebrate the English manufacturer's 50th anniversary. 8 x 7. Jul 22, 2021 · But ten years is still ten years and a lifetime in the world of audio-product cycles. KEF LS50 vs ELAC Debut 2. with two stereo subwoofers placed very close to each speakers for good sound results . In this section, we are going to compare GoldenEar BRX's and KEF LS50 Meta's external dimensions. Thanks Jul 17, 2021 · I think bass-extension is where LS50 Meta struggles most (had to dig into KEF white paper to find it: 79hz-3dB). Feb 10, 2018 · LS50 vs Q150; LS50 vs Q350; LS50 vs Klipsch RP160M and RP150M; LS50 wireless vs Q150; LS50 wireless vs KEF Blade 2; and I will get KEF blade 2, jk lol. 0 x 281. 0 x 313. 2 Speaker Comparison In this review, we will be comparing LS50 and Debut 2. In this section, we are going to compare KEF LSX II LT's and KEF LS50 Meta's external dimensions. Aug 28, 2022 · The Verdict: KEF LS50 Meta vs R3. This makes the LS50 Wireless II 56% heavier than the Sonos Five. And due to coaxial design I think boosting the bass with DSP (like they do with LS50Wireless) will do it no favours. 875 x 12. Frequency Response. However, the more compact LS50 Meta still out-performs the majority of bookshelf speakers on the market, is . See full list on whathifi. Let's have a brief look at the main features of KEF LS50 and Klipsch RP-600M first before getting into our more detailed comparison. You will notice the extra juice the wireless kefs have, bass is deeper and tigher, they play loud more effortless. 3mm less deeper than KEF LS50 Wireless II but it is also 37. Nov 5, 2021 · The LS50 Wireless ii has an analog input. 1 inch) whereas KEF LS50 Wireless II has external dimensions of 277. 2 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. 1lbs and the KEF LS50 Wireless II weighs 10. If you're looking for a pair of Hi-fidelity speakers with quintessential minimal aesthetics that gives you high-quality listening pleasure, do consider having a […] After ARC, I enjoy(ed) the ls50 meta, but love the R3's. 9 x 8. the sound stage was really good and they sound damn good great detail like you said but i found i needed to use a sub with them. If you want a sleek speaker ready for a modern home theater space, the KEF LS50 Meta is an excellent option. The LS50 is sleek, modern, and out of this world. Its body is 12mm wider, 812. This was for my wife's system. Oct 3, 2020 · KEF LS50 Meta - 1500 USD; KEF R3 - 1800 USD; The value propositions. 0 x 296. 2mm taller. 0mm ( 11. 0 x 337. However, I paid $399 for the Dentons, and $1200 for the LS50's, and I would not say that the LS50's are 3x as good as the Dentons (especially when factoring in the lovely veneer on the Dentons). 0mm ( 16-5/8-inch x 7-15/16-inch x 13-1/4-inch) whereas KEF LS50 Meta has external dimensions of 303. Nov 12, 2024 · As of 10 Dec 2024, experts prefer Kef LS50 over Wharfedale EVO 4. KEF LSX II LT has external dimensions of 240 × 155 × 180 mm ( 9. Today, the LS50 line comprises two models: LS50 Meta – A traditional passive bookshelf speaker with standalone components. As per this month's meta ranking, Kef LS50 received 5 recommendations: from ZD Net (13 Feb 2023), T3 (12 Nov 2024) Gear Patrol (16 Jul 2024) and 2 others. KEF LS50 Meta is clearly the larger of the two Jan 14, 2017 · The Dentons originally retailed for $1000 and the LS50's originally retained for $1500. Based purely on sonic output, the KEF R3 is the better choice (>>> Check on Amazon). Borea BR03 has a frequency range of 46 - 22k Hz whereas LS50 has a frequency range of 79-28k Hz. Below Jan 7, 2022 · Need some advice on which set to get. Both offer good overall sound transparency, but the KEF LSX can get a little muddy in the sub-bass frequencies. 0 x 278. To be honest I prefer the sound of Q150/Q350 over both LS50's. 0mm ( 11-13/16 x 7-7/8 x 11-1/16inch) whereas KEF LS50 Meta has external dimensions of 303. 2, two Passive Bookshelf speakers from KEF and ELAC . These speakers have gained widespread recognition for their exceptional performance and … Monitor Audio Dec 21, 2021 · I would like your opinions on the three sets of speakers I am considering. Its body is 96mm Jul 2, 2018 · The KEF LS50 ($1,300/pair) has been regarded as some of the best desktop monitors (or hi-fi speakers, for their size) that you could buy since their release in 2012, but the British audio manufacturer has since released the KEF LS50 Wireless ($2,200/pair). Comparison image of Dynaudio Focus 10 and KEF LS50 Wireless II Size and External Dimensions May 6, 2021 · Turn on the KEF LS50 Wireless II and you are greeted by the most immersive, distortion-free sound you've probably ever heard from speakers this size. 0 x 202. There’s no question that KEF’s LS50, which sells for $1499. 00kg / 22lbs. The LS50 Meta comes in different colors and I must say, it looks stunning in white: KEF LS50 vs Klipsch RP-600M Speaker Comparison In this review, we will be comparing LS50 and RP-600M, two Passive Bookshelf speakers from KEF and Klipsch . Jul 28, 2022 · The Kef ls50 Meta has high distortion from 130 Hz and below at 86 dB , and need to be crossed at this freq. Its body is 10mm wider, 56mm taller and 28mm deeper than KEF LS50. Let's have a brief look at the main features of B&W 706 S3 and KEF LS50 Meta first before getting into our more detailed comparison. Around $1,600 per pair. Jun 14, 2022 · IMHO. Jun 20, 2023 · When it comes to bookshelf speakers, striking the perfect balance between design, sound quality, and technological innovation is key. com Feb 16, 2019 · Both speakers are looking very nice with a modern and minimalist look. 7mm deeper than KEF LS50 Jan 24, 2014 · The two speakers that are on my shortlist are the KEF LS50 and a used set of Rogers LS3/5a's, neither of which I have had a chance to audition yet. Apr 19, 2016 · But let’s talk only about the LS50, Reference 1, and Blade Two, since they illustrate the kinds of differences you get as you move up in price. 40kg / 14. 0 x 200. Sweeter, fuller and more natural on vocals and live instruments. Not sure if the Philharmonic BMR has a center? I will be using two 18" Dayton Ultimax sealed subwoofers with this system and know that will factor in. Aug 31, 2021 · Home Theater: AppleTV / Sony X800 / Audirvana / Moode -> Denon X2500H -> KEF LS50 Meta mains, KEF Q150 center and SVS SB-1000 Pro sub Home TV Room: AppleTV -> Sony STR-DN1080 -> Wharfedale Diamond 8. Despite the likeness in name, the LS50 Wireless speakers are more than just Bluetooth Frequency Response. I'm hoping that their relatively smooth directivity means that using Dirac and my SHD's EQ, I will be able to correct most of their imperfections. Comparison image of KEF LS50 Meta and KEF Q350 Size and External Dimensions In this section, we are going to compare KEF R3 Meta's and KEF LS50 Meta's external dimensions. Oct 8, 2017 · i had the Q100 first, had them on stands and running with various vintage receivers. I did try several different amps with the LS50, Onix A-120 (120 wpc) and a McCormack DNA 125 (125 wpc) but noticed no difference. Apr 30, 2021 · Similarly priced Genelec’s are a league better than KEF LS50 Wireless, in all regards, period. 0 x 322. 9inch) . 99/pr. LS50 Meta has a frequency range of 79-28k Hz whereas Q150 has a frequency range of 51-28k Hz. 8 x 10. Should I return the ls50 meta or keep it? I'm going pair the ls50 meta with a sub, Q650 center and some other speakers for surround, uage is about 60/40 TV/Music. The cabinets are remarkably compact considering the drivers and other technology inside, with an attractive matte finish available in 4 different colors, including unique options like Royal Blue and Titanium Grey. Below you can see the front view size comparison of Dynaudio Focus 10 and KEF LS50 Wireless II in scale. KEF R3 Meta is clearly the larger Why is the KEF LS50 much better than a Devialet Phantom? Can u justify with data why? whats the DB of the KEF, and the frequency range? DEVIALET PHANTOM 1200 Watts | 101 dB | 16Hz to 25kHz I´ve heard a Devialet phantom and seems to me very impossible to get a sharper and crisp sound without any noice or distortion, the bass is just unbelievable. In this section, we are going to compare KEF LSX II's and KEF LS50 Meta's external dimensions. KEF LS50 Meta is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Nov 12, 2024 · As of 10 Dec 2024, experts prefer Kef LS50 over Harbeth P3ESR, but both Speakers have solid expert endorsements. It was kindly purchased new by a member and drop shipped to me and costs US $1,500 for a pair. At those prices, the LS50s were clearly the better buy. The Sonos Five weighs 6. 3mm deeper than KEF LSX II. 8 x 200. Associated Equipment: KEF LS50 were driven by a Cambridge Audio Azur 851A connected to a Matrix X-Sabre Pro DAC running Tidal Hi-Fi. 9375 x 7. Nov 15, 2024 · The LS50 Wireless launched in 2016 as an active speaker system take on KEF’s legendary passive LS50 speakers. 5inch) whereas KEF LS50 Wireless II has external dimensions of 277. LS50 has a frequency range of 79-28k Hz whereas Q150 has a frequency range of 51-28k Hz. The LS50 were a bit hot in the highs and the Meta were neutral and maybe a bit laid back. KEF Q550 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. KEF engineers were aware that its competitors haven’t stood still, either. 5 × 6. Jan 26, 2024 · You get the now-familiar KEF sonic signature that is wonderfully clean, punchy, maturely balanced and clearly detailed, but this LS50 Wireless II, with its larger cabinet volume and larger drivers and more power, just sounds so effortless. Let's have a brief look at the main features of KEF LS50 and ELAC Debut 2. 0mm ( 42. May 30, 2022 · KEF LS50 Meta KEF LS50. It is a fully active, wireless stereo speaker system that combines cutting-edge technology with stunning aesthetics. This can be seen objectively in the NRC measurements, where the on-axis sound in the range 2-5 kHz is elevated by about 5 dB. Dec 6, 2021 · Unfortunately you really need to listen to the speakers or find a store with a good exchange policy, KEF offers a bit more dynamics and great timing, Dynaudio is smooth, deep bass, warm pleasant vocals even on less then stellar recordings but less dynamic both macro and micro, little less true to recording, that’s where the LS50’s tend to Apr 30, 2021 · The KEF LS50 Wireless ii’s have exceeded my good but realistic expectations. May 30, 2023 · KEF LS50 Wireless II: A True Icon The LS50 Wireless II is a testament to KEF’s dedication to engineering excellence. Aug 7, 2021 · This is a review and detailed measurements of the KEF LS50 Meta bookshelf coaxial speaker. Get the R3 (and later a sub if you can’t afford one right away). i moved them to the mains in my HT system when i got a pair of Ls50's and they they really shine there. 1 × 7. Detailed comparison of the KEF LS50 Meta vs KEF LS50 speakers to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. Thanks in advance! Share Add a Comment In this section, we are going to compare KEF LS50C Meta's and KEF LS50 Meta's external dimensions. In this review, we will be comparing LS50 Wireless II and LS50 Meta, two Bookshelf speakers by KEF The main difference between these two speakers is that the KEF LS50 Wireless II is a Powered speaker which means that it has a built-in amplifier inside the speaker body so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp whereas the KEF LS50 Meta is a Passive speaker so has to be KEF LSX II has external dimensions of 240 × 155 × 180 mm ( 9. 2mm taller and 71. 0 B5. Rather than taking a winning formula and starting from scratch, KEF chose to innovate its way to a better LS50. Below you can see the front view size comparison of KEF LS50 Meta and KEF Q350 in scale. 0 x 394. rofisw johjpy azgcsdiz tpsykb rhna mtzwhn mdjmdsbq onix jyiktwa mnwu