4k 60fps vs 1440p 144hz With full raytracing I get around 60-70fps so I lock the framerate at 60fps and it's very smooth, but if I disable raytracing and lower some of the fancy stuff (like having volumetric lighting or fog or whatever set to Medium instead of Ultra or Psycho) then I get around 120ish fps, and it's so buttery-smooth. Based on my current experience, I'll gladly sit at 60 FPS with a 1440p IPS panel monitor over a 144 Hz TN panel. 0 supports I'm using R5 3600 and 3070 so I'm playing 4K games at 60fps pretty fine. If you can run a game at a rock solid 60fps then you barely see any 'smoothness' difference. So you'll drop to 30hz and 55fps and then you'll have tearing. 32 inch IPS: This is the moment I would flip to 4k 120+hz. And now thr human eye only sees on avg 60 fps. So my next debate was weather to get 4K or 1440p. A 4k 144hz monitor can still run a LOT of money, and I don't know if any cards are going to be hitting that mark on So I decided to return it and get a g-sync. I would go for 4k 144hz if you can afford it. (At least when I was checking a year ago, and USB-C was a must have for me so it might be worth checking others out. This would lean me toward just getting the 4k 144hz monitor and being done However as games continue to push hardware boundaries over the next 5-8 years, I question how soon before the card is pushed down into the 4k less than 60FPS range. Limited immersion on larger screens: On larger displays, Yes, 4K is about high-res gaming (and other media), but you'll still need solid gaming specs, like a 120 Hz-plus refresh rate, low response time, and your choice of Adaptive-Sync (Nvidia G-Sync or These are largely subjective questions that I don't feel comfortable answering, especially since my 1440p/4k frame of reference is a much larger display. 4 to support 60fps and then DisplayPort to display 144hz and consoles don't support that HDMI 1. So that means that motion is Unless you primarily play esports games, I'd say go for 4k 144hz. That's why It’s fine but it’s noticeably less pixel dense. Elden Ring is an action RPG which takes place in the Lands Between, sometime เลือกจออะไรดีระหว่าง 2k 144HZ กับ 4k 60HZ ใช้การ์ดจอ 1080 เล่นเวป เล่น A 4k/120Hz monitor/TV, the game will output at native 4k/120fps. In older and less demanding games you'll be able to push it without any issue and in modern games you have DLSS, and 1440p DLSS to 4K > 1440p native. 1440p 144hz vs 4k 144hz for competitive gaming Vertical/portrait monitor would you choose a 4k 60fps or 1080p 240hz? comments. In contrast, 4K 60Hz excels in the realm of single-player Can't afford a 1440p 144Hz gaming monitor and have to settle for either 1440p 60Hz or 1080p 144Hz? We'll help you decide what to pick in this guide. Aside from the fact that at normal screen sizes and viewing distances 4K is mostly indistinguishable from 1440p the performance hit you take and the added issues of 60hz screens are NOT worth it. Thank you to Ruipro for sponsoring this video!Buy the Ruipro HDMI 2. 66 Gbps: 1. 144hz 1440p 4K is just overkill will put 1k in the ground and 60hz in gaming is not good and it’s Page 6: Nvidia RTX 4060: 1440p and 4K Gaming Performance Page 7: Nvidia RTX 4060: Our rasterization suite shows that most of these games are still very playable, with many breaking 60 fps. With a 27” monitor and sitting say 70cm (2. However, if you're more of a casual gamer, then 4k is better. You notice the full detail of high resolution textures, and importantly aliasing (jagged edges) is much less 144hz at 1440p is a sweet spot, if you have a GPU which is capable of running games at high framerates. its nothing like 60hz vs 144hz imo. I can't wait. There are game modes however that set targets for both framerate and/or FPS. I got a Dell 1440p 27" 144Hz TN monitor last week and am returning it today. 4 supports 1080p 144hz HDMI 2. 5" 165Hz, 1ms MPRT MSI Optix MAG322CQR 32", (2K) 1ms (MPRT) / 4ms (GTG) Just keep 4k, it's a good default to have and the vast majority of games aren't 1440p or 120hz, and if you run into a situation where you can actually use it, it's circumstantial so use that only when you specifically need. The 4080 is in a weird spot, faster than a 3090 (a 4k@60 card IMO) but nowhere near as fast as a 4090 (a 4k@120+ card if you ask me, still need to tweak at times for 144). You'll have much more space for you interface, which allows you to see much more of the game. Even for non-gaming stuff, the 4K monitor will just look great and you could probably get close to that 144 FPS range in Fortnite with a 3080 Ti if you turn some settings down (for TBH 60hz vs 144hz is often the biggest difference of what you listed, at least if you actually play at high fps to match it. PC gamers are still buying monitors with resolutions of 1080p or 1440p, though 4K is slowly becoming more popular. Bench marks lead me to believe the 3080 ti can comfortably handle 4k 80+ frames on ultra settings. Just get the 27GP950, it will be amazing for CAD and productivity work, and it will be quite nice for gaming, even at 1080P for now, and higher resolution later when . I run i7-12700F and GTX1070OCmini. For me to call it "1440p 240 VRR" That would mean the average FPS is within 180-240fps on a 240hz panel. 4 (not for AAA gaming of course). If you want to actually see 144fps then get a 144Hz monitor, otherwise, there's no point comparing between refresh rates. 4K at 60fps is a very good virtual pinball experience, and good enough for almost every vpin owner. It has hdmi 2. However in my monitor research I keep reading about how a high refresh rate makes a higher quality moving image than 4k does. At 1440P 144Hz you are pushing more pixels per second than 4k at 60Hz It depends on your games, sensitivity to frame time variances, how well Freesync compensates for that, and your other uses. If you play lots of shooters and competitive games in which you move and change direction quickly, you will want a 1440p 120fps monitor. For a general purpose and gaming PC, without much focus on work/production/etc, then 1440p/144Hz is deemed the sweet-spot if you can afford it. 93 Gbps: 3840×2160 2160p UHD: 5. With a 980 Ti I'd definitely go for a 1440p monitor, but it would have to be a 144hz. 60fps or 144fps don’t matter in Paradox games. You should be I don't think any game can run 120fps, possibly a Ps5 pro will have that power and i've seen some videos showing that the 4k may have ghosting effect, if you choose a higher hz say 120hz you may notice interpolation, stuttering juddering and screen tearing even on movies so personally i'd stick with a 4K 60fps TV with a good hdmi 2. It’s not really the same for FPS. I have used both, a big TV 4K 60hz and currently using a 1440P 144hz 27" display and in most cases the 1440p is a better experience. 55 inch OLED for couch gaming. (I know 4k provides better visual. 2fps (min/average) - nowhere close to 144fps. Reply reply KING5TON On another note, if your 1440p monitor is capable of taking 4k signal and downscaling it to its native resolution, definitely try that out because it really did look good! Not quite as good as 4k however, and also, most (if not all) 1440p monitors capable of taking a 4K signal and downscaling it CANNOT do so whilst still producing 120hz. IMO 1440p 27" is about the bare Page 6: Nvidia RTX 4060: 1440p and 4K Gaming Performance Page 7: Nvidia RTX 4060: Our rasterization suite shows that most of these games are still very playable, I upgraded from a dell 60hz 1080p monitor to a 144hz 1440p monitor while using this hardware. I think if you are going monitor then yes I would get a monitor no bigger than 27 inches and 1440p / 144hz but to me the sweet spot television is the new TCL mini led It does 4k/60 and 1440p 120hz. And it’s even more expensive than 4K 144 Hz, and even a 3090 Ti will struggle to get 200+ FPS without DLSS in many games, and with DLSS you get much better quality at 4K. This is the subreddit for the Elden Ring gaming community. I do mostly play story-based games like RDR2, Tomb Raider, etc so I don't really need high refresh rate. 1440p vs 4K: Which is Better. Enough said. In this age of 4K though 1440p would seem to be the new minimum HD people use. If you have extra budget, see Samsung id probably still go with a 1440p 240hz then. Slower paced games you can turn settings up higher for the same framerate, and faster paced games will run dramatically smoother. Get a 1440p 144Hz VRR monitor. 1440p @ 144hz if you play competitive multiplayer games, love high FPS, and/or have a limited budget. 4090s and the 7900xtx both still can barely pull 4k 60fps with steady frame rates in most games with out upscalers or dropping settings. Reply reply 3080 will no doubt do 4K 60FPS Ultra in most games, if it's actually 2X as good as the 2080. 49 Gbps: 3. Horizon looks great in 4k HDR. com: 2k with +144Hz refresh rate monitors: GIGABYTE G32QC 32" 165Hz 1440P ASUS TUF VG32VQ1B 31. In regards to resolution, native 1440p looks good on 27~28" panel where 4k can be too tiny for some people. 8K is a dream away, especially with the sheer performance required by the GPU and Well a 2080ti can't do 4k 144hz or 1440p 240hz in AAA games only more esports titles and even with a 30% increase in performance that the 3080ti will probably have I don't see it happening either way. For 4K 60FPS, I don’t think there is a better choice right now. I play most games at high/ultra settings. Does 1440p 120hz or 4k 60hz with freesync does same on my Xbox series x but with freesync added bonus on 120hz 1440p for some reason on Playstation you need hdmi 2. Getting 80-100 fps is common, and even the most demanding game should hold 60 fps no problem. I say buy once, cry once. I prefer 4K 144Hz. So if it is a gpu bottleneck instead of cpu, then 4k 60fps would be about the same as 1440p 120fps, although 1440p is actually a bit less than half of 4k so that might make it a lot closer to 4k60 = 1440p144, but that extra 24 frames over 120 might just 1440p very slightly harder to run. 4 so it only supports 4k at 30hz. 4K with DLSS performance looks much better than 1440P with DLSS in quality mode, yet you can expect framerates to land in a similar ballpark. The obvious sweetspot of 1440p 144hz has been left out of the question, but is a great choice Reply reply Best 4K 60 fps screen that works with the PS5 Reply reply More replies. Jun 14, 2016 25 0 1,530. You are doing it the other way. La resolución de la pantalla y la frecuencia de refresco son las principales diferencias entre los monitores 1440p 144Hz y 4k 60Hz, pero la forma en que estas diferencias afectan a los jugadores varía de una persona a otra. If you want to spend money on low resolution and high frame rates you cannot even perceive rather than getting a clearer picture Cons: Visuals not as sharp: While offering good visuals, 1440p does not match the level of detail and clarity that 4K provides, especially noticeable on larger screens. My set up is 4K and never stop The Samsung QN95D and the Samsung QN95C QLED are almost identical, and you should get the cheapest one you can find. Surprised you're getting playable framerates on 4K tbh. You need a very powerful system to reach 60 FPS at 4K. Maybe my eyes are just weird, but I genuinely cannot tell the difference. I tried to use a 27” 1440p 240hz monitor twice and immediately disliked it. I greatly prefer 4K resolution and the IPS panel over the faster refresh rate that I can't even see. Thread starter LordAragon; Start date Jun 23, 2016; Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar. 1440p@144Hz is only 6. 1440p to 4k is a significant jump in clarity but to me it doesn't "feel" as big of a jump as 1080p to 1440p or at least doesn't feel worth it a lot of the time when you take the bigger performance hit into account. Even then, 4K is very rapidly becoming the new "hd" like 1080p. Hi, I want to buy a 32" gaming monitor that is in the range of 300 - 500 dollars max. I have a deep desk and wanted a larger monitor. Not as future-proof: As game developers optimize for higher resolutions, upgrading may become necessary sooner than if you had chosen 4K. Obviously 4k 60fps is what I'm familiar with, and as I was finally able to get a 3080 I'd like to keep using 4k. As for 2k vs 4k - look up GPU performance based of games. It won't always push 60fps at 4k but it won't always push high framerates at 144hz either. I have both a 144hz 1440p and a 4k 60hz, gaming on my 1440p is hands down a If you want to actually see 144fps then get a 144Hz monitor, otherwise, there's no point comparing between refresh rates. I’m convinced the 1440p 144hz tribe has never truly experienced a proper 4K display with VRR. Click to expand That Both Native: 4k @ 60hz vs 1440p @ 165hz: Bit better resolution at 4k of course but on the 1440p besides lower frame rates you could feel the higher 144hz, especially in games like BF4! I 100% agree after 1440p 75 hz it looks so bad if I play anything in 1080p at 144 it doesn't look as good. 86 Gbps: 35. Decided to sell it all for a nice profit. 46 Gbps: 8. I went with the 1440p/144hz over the 4K because even tho apex console caps at 60fps the game felt way snappier and smoother to me on the 144hz. In every other case, definitely 1440p I think that it is the best of both worlds as you get 1440p resolution and 165hz refresh rate. A 144hz monitor at 60 fps, is still much better then a 60hz monitor at 60fps also I don’t have enough hardware to run 4K 144Hz, I can’t wait when that day is here. My take on it is if you go 4k at ultimate settings some games may shoot you into the low 30's for FPS which is where stuttering and lag appears. I can get 45FPS in Metro Exodus at 4K ultra with ray tracing on high and that's a pretty taxing game I highly recommend 1440p 144hz. That said, there are a lot of great $200-300 1440p options and I feel like I’m unlikely to miss some extra pixels, plus I may actually enjoy the bonus 1440p 165 hz, 60 hz for fps will be a huge disadvantage, I have the same specs on my monitor, my last monitor was 8k 60hz, the difference is huge There is no world he can hit 120 4k. Home. And the 1440p vs 4k debate. That's why I too am looking for a 3070 FE specifically (fucking scalpers lol). Costco has one for $700. 4k monitors are the king for image sharpness compared to 1080p and 1440p, which is the main advantage of those resolutions. I have a 27inch 1440p240hz display and a RTX3080. 120->144 and above, I Yes a 1440p monitor would work just fine on the 6700xt, and that is the option I would go with myself if I were in your shoes. Red dead, watch dogs, and the Witcher all are hard to run especially at 1440p. 4k can be considered from 32" and above. 1440p is a great resolution for gaming without blowing a huge budget and wasting money/heat/power bill/carbon footprint for 4K/144Hz. you wont be getting much more than 60fps in 1440p anyways and in 4k you will probably hover around so 4k 60hz vs 2560x1440 144hz. If the game is running above 144Hz, then G-Sync helps prevent screen tearing. do you think the resolution or Spec sheet says it supports 4k/144hz over displayport 1. I can't see a difference between 60fps and 144fps. Beyond 32 inch: Definitely 4k 120+hz. It provides a true native 4K 60+ fps experience in nearly any title without excessive compromises, and even allows for high framerate 4K gaming exceeding 100+ fps. Top 1% Rank by size . Reply reply As soon as I tried 1440p 144hz I never went back watching my wife play overwatch on a 60 hz monitor makes me feel sick and sad inside like a crazy I would take more framerate than clearer resolution, so in this scenario I would get 1440p 240hz. Pair the 1080ti with a My two cents on 27” 4K 144Hz(120Hz) gaming using a PG27U with a 4090. I have 27 inch 1440p 144hz and 32" 4k 144hz. I The 1080ti is still going to struggle to push 60 fps max settings at 4k on AAA games. Displays Would you guys go with a asus mg28uq 28 4k 60 hz or a ASUS ROG SWIFT PG278QR 27 165 hz. Above 32" 2k gonna be slightly blurry. 1 for VRR but does not do 120hz at 4k. Thread starter GlenMicallef; Start date Feb 24, 2017; Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar. LordAragon Commendable. If I were to go 1440p 144hz would the RTX 3070 be overkill compared to the 3060ti or would it be best to spend the extra £($)100 on a 3070 for the better performance. It's very much like scrolling a webpage on 30 vs 60 fps and just how smooth it feels. In my experience, 30->60 is massive (30 is unacceptable to me, like on many consoles), 60->90 is definitely worthwhile, and 90->120 is noticeable but not huge. 4k is Just not worth it. Well in that case it doesn’t really matter which resolution you choose. Looking at benchmarks, though, it seems like the 6950 xt is more than capable of high-fps 4K gaming. if you turn off the aa which you shouldnt even ened at 4k, that would lighten the burden. since i prefer to only have 1 monitor 4k feels nice because its like having the space of 2 screens in 1. To get 60 fps @ 4k and above 120 fps @ 1440p will need about the same GPU setup. » LG 34GP83-AB - IPS, one of the fav on reddit. Its a 27 inch monitor, 4k really isnt worth the price at 27 inch. The jump from 1440p to 4K is noticeably but it’s not as jarring as the jump from 1080 to 1440. I have found these monitors in newegg. The jump from 60hz to 144hz is a lot bigger imo than 1440p to 4k, especially at 27" Reply reply I also play a lot of indie games and lighter games, and even with a GTX 970, I handle 4K just fine. 70-90fps has the greatest impact on the perception of smoothness, in fact at this point for me going from 60-80 is almost as much of a jump as going from 30-60. The difference between 1440p 144Hz monitors and 4k 60Hz monitors is primarily screen resolution and refresh rate, but the ways that these differences affect gamers vary from person to person. More posts you may like r/pcgaming. 4k 60fps on a 60-inch tv from 4 ft away. . 93 Gbps: 29. I don't see any benefit for 4k vs 1440p tbh - whereas an ultrawide monitor really is significantly more immersive. If you are going to be close to the screen, go for a 1440p display. Red Dead Redemption 2 - 4K VS 2K Graphics Comparison Gameplay [60HZ-30FPS VS 144HZ-60FPS] 1440P VS 2160PJoin this channel to get access to perks:https://www. 4K is about 44% more pixels than 1440p and it’s also much more demanding on your system. Reply reply ClubChaos • • There is loads of 1440p 144Hz. Also, the difference in iq between native 4K vs dldsr 4K is much greater than 1440p on a native 1440p display vs 1440p on a 120 Hz: 144 Hz: 1280×720 720p HD: 0. But in short yeah go for 1440p 144Hz. You get diminishing returns from both, but I sure as hell notice the difference between 60hz and 144hz way more than 1080p and 1440p. 60hz wouldn't kill you, considering the card would pump out frame rates at 60 and The obvious sweetspot of 1440p 144hz has been left out of the question, but is a great choice Reply reply Best 4K 60 fps screen that works with the PS5 Reply reply More replies. The new 4k/144hz displays being "launched" now are already showing signs of being a mess. I ended up selling my 4k 144hz monitor and I kept my 1440p 240hz monitor. If not, 4k 60fps or 1440p As you mentioned you are not hitting 60+ FPS on your games anyway. 240hz to 360hz is going to be even smaller than that. Also, the difference in iq between native 4K vs dldsr 4K is much greater than 1440p on a native 1440p display vs 1440p on a I went with the 1440p/144hz over the 4K because even tho apex console caps at 60fps the game felt way snappier and smoother to me on the 144hz. Reply reply 1080p 144hz. Reply reply How does the Series X perform on 1440p 144hz? comments. Welcome to the official subreddit of the PC Master Race / PCMR! All PC-related content is welcome, including build help, tech support, and any doubt one might have about PC ownership. I decided on the Asus PG279Q (1440p, 165Hz). A 144Hz monitor wouldn't serve any purpose. เลือกจออะไรดีระหว่าง 2k 144HZ กับ 4k 60HZ ใช้การ์ดจอ 1080 เล่นเวป เล่น it truly is imo, the most important part of the build along with the GPU. IMHO, 2k 144Hz is a good compromise at 32". I would happily save up money for a period of time to make that purchase, or wait for the price to go down, simply because monitors last a LONG time and it would be a long term investment. Rise of the tomb raider, witcher 3 1440p has roughly half as many pixels as 4k. 8fps - dips below 60 with averages above. I've updated I also have a 4K 55" TV connected to the PC and I rarely use it for gaming. Like I said, it would be interesting to use the same monitor at 60hz vs 144hz and check the difference. 60fps to 120fps is also massive. The jump from 60fps to 144Hz is much more noticeable than 1440p to 4K. Edit: Using a bandwidth calculator I found the following results for different resolutions/refresh rates: 4k@30Hz: 8. Hardware I am upgrading from a 1080p monitor to go with a new build that should be able to handle either of these resolutions well. 97 Gbps: 14. Does this game even largely benefit from 144hz or is it no problem with 60hz?) 1080 is not enough to keep 1440p at 144Hz 4K will be at 45-60fps Once you go 144hz you wil become eye cancer on a 60hz monitor, ill promise Enjoy 1440p 144hz maxed out with your gpu Edit: ive 8700k with 3080 and 1440p 144hz @27" Before i go 4k i would go super ultrawide with double 1440p as it would still be a bit less demanding onnthe gpu and allows more in therms of productivity or 2 1440p streams side by side or 2 1080p plus other stuff I'm playing Cyberpunk @ native 1440p on a 32" 144hz monitor. Especially if you decide to go with a 4K OLED. Pros of 1440p 144hz: Save $150 and additional monitor cost, 144hz playing fps like csgo Con: Missing out on 4K for watching videos 1440p 144hz. But if it is a AAA (or just graphically intense) then scale down to 1080p is fine, or 1440p is fine too. With 144hz every 7ms. But in answer to your question, does 4K look that much better: yes it does. Likewise, 100-120fps would count to me as "4K 120 VRR" Example, if you were running a PS4 pro, you would probably want a 4k screen since it is locked at 30fps. With 60hz you get a frame every 16ms. I'm ready to upgrade to a better monitor, I'm tired of 60fps but i'm also tired of 1080p. It’s much easier to achieve the smoothness of 120+fps at 1440p than it is with 4K if you want to max out graphics settings. In games, you may have to make tradeoffs. Is the difference in resolution or the difference in refresh rate more noticeable? I enjoy to game and will also be using 1440P does look sharper than 1080p certainly. I use an AW 1080p 360 monitor for esports titles. I also realize that a good 4K monitor is harder to find than the tons of 1440p 144hz monitors out there, but I also feel like I would regret not opting for a 4K monitor for media consumption. 1 port if u If you are looking for games that LOOK more stunning and beautiful but don't care about the competitive aspect as much, 4K at 60 fps is going to be the one for you. Going from 1440p/144hz to 4K/144hz is going to be a much much more apparent upgrade than going to 1440p/240+, in my experience. Reply reply Hey, thank you very much. 66 Gbps: 3. Thread starter j-lor; Start date Dec 11, 2017; Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar. Forget 4k under 32", the high ppi will require scaling which sucks, also current 4k monitor are stuck a 60Hz which is a bummer an to go beyond would require a better GPU 1440p 21:9 120hz freesync would be optimal More immersion during gaming, smooth image and no black bars for movie and more content is going ultrawide as we go. yes it is smooth. To deliver consistent and smooth frame rates, a GPU must possess not only a large amount of video memory but also sufficient bandwidth and processing cores. 1440p is better than 4K for gaming because it’s not as demanding on hardware and it’s easier to reach high refresh rates. Haven't had access to a 4k monitor, but I can't imagine the difference between 4k and 1440p is as noticeable as 60hz vs 144hz at least for me. 4k isn't to much off 1440p. Desktop, no comparison, the higher resolution all the way. Conversely, you could use dldsr to get a 4K like image on a 1440p monitor, though it works better in some games than others and is 3-7% more demanding than native 4K. Also remember newer games coming will be more detailed and require even more horsepower, so fps only gets lower in that situation on 4k . That and unless you are a pro esports gamer you won't notice a difference between 4K @ 60hz if you play single player, need ultra settings, and can afford a proper 4K display. Every game is also not 60fps let alone 4k checkerboard. 73 Gbps: 7. They can't do 4k/144hz without dropping 4:4:4 chroma subsampling. With the GPU market already crazy and then LG ran out of stock on the 4k 144hz models. The reason being that your 4k monitors refresh rate will always go down by half whenever 60fps usnt viable. 100hz 1440p is better than a 144hz 1080p imo unless competitive gaming. but the difference between 240hz and 144hz is a lot smaller than you think. 46 4k 60 hz vs 1440p 144 hz. 9fps - under 60fps. Yes. A lot of these monitors come with HDMI 1. I sacrificed about £200 to get a completely white build (except the gpu, couldn't wait for the galax hof to come out or something similar) but then I saw the 1440p was on sale making it only about £20 more Personally I prefer 4K textures. If you are planning on getting a new pc 120 hz or even 144 hz will feel amazing. 5’ for y’all rednecks) you will barely notice the difference between 4K and 1440p, it’s how our eyes work. Today's While using a 4K 144Hz monitor won’t cap your games at 144fps, 165Hz screens like BenQ’s 1440p MOBIUZ can catch and display more frames per second, resulting in a With a 3060 you're definitely better off at 1440p. So, for instance, on my 1440p 144hz monitor, I need a DP1. This is what I have to say. On another note, if your 1440p monitor is capable of taking 4k signal and downscaling it to its native resolution, definitely try that out because it really did look good! Not quite as good as 4k however, and also, most (if not all) 1440p monitors capable of taking a 4K signal and downscaling it CANNOT do so whilst still producing 120hz. In summary: 27" 1440p Yeah if you don't have space to run a 4K monitor for general use and and higher hz monitor, so you can only chose one, I'd definitely go with the 4K 144hz. I'd pick that over any 4K monitors any day. Should I go 4k@144hz maybe UW1440p@175Hz or stay at 1440p@240hz for my 3080 Ti ? comments. I don’t think 144hz. Anything below like a 3080 you'll be glad you avoided 4K. Reply reply With DLSS, the performance difference between 1440P and 4K is far smaller, and in 4K things often look better at similar performance targets. I recently got a monitor from a friend and tried plugging in a hdmi 2 into my laptop to make use of the monitor's 4k 60hz, but unfortunately my current laptop doesn't support that and only has a hdmi 1. 30fps to 60fps is massive. 6800XT can drive some at 4k~60, but not all. 4k or even 1440p @ 60FPS with all the eye candy the Series X can handle turned on. I certainly prefer gameplay at 1440p/120fps to 4k/60fps and your 3070ti is more than capable. 1440p, 240hz, 49inch, G-Sync & Freesync. On 27" screen you will barely notice For the smoothest experience go for 1440p. If you were to decide between 144HZ 1080p or a guaranteed 60Hz at 1440p then the 1440p would probably give you the better experience with the extra real estate. In short, you should Simpy put, if you want to sit on the sofa and be far from the screen, it's better to have a larger 4K display. At 1440p I am getting 144 fps solid, monitor is 144hz. r/buildapc. People think you have to achieve over 100fps to benefit from high refresh rate monitors but that is completely false. So for me, I mainly play competitive shooter 4K 60Hz vs 1080p 144Hz. 1440p 144hz Vs 4k 60FPS. Also my buget is around $600 and if you know of any good monitors to suggest please post the name of it. 83 Gbps: To calculate a specific configuration's required It was 4k with 60fps vs 1440p with 144fps. Perfectly happy with the quality of 1440p, it's amazing especially on an IPS panel, but combined with the high FPS its smooth as hell too. 60hz means you’ll have significantly more motion blur, worse positional accuracy, less smooth movement, and on top of that most games don’t Considerations for the best GPU for 4K gaming at 60 FPS. 4K » ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q1A – 4k, 60hz, freesync, good entry level 4k gaming monitor. Deciding Between 1440p 144hz or 4k 60hz Display comments. I did some monitor upgrades for the first time in years and initially went with a 1440p Mass Effect will look awesome in 4K, and 60fps will be a big improvement over the original anyway. 4k 30hz vs 1440p 60hz . Moreover, as we target different refresh rates, the requirements And a note: it's really worth stating how FEW games run 4k @ 60+ fps at high settings when it comes to new games. This all sounds very off topic from the title, but I wanted to give my current But since its a 4K monitor, and 4K gaming is very demanding, where you rarely reach 60 FPS, even with a Titan XP, is 60 hz enough? How does g-sync help with the screen A 4k/120Hz monitor/TV, the game will output at native 4k/120fps. The resolution upgrade is noticable if you are 1440p 144hz vs. Having had both 144hz 1440p and 60hz 4k, I can safely say that for flight sim games, side scrollers, and racing games, the 4k takes the crown, but for first person shooters, there's no comparison - the 1440p 144hz is the king. LG GP850 great screen i have the 32" version. For gaming don't even look at 60Hz it's garbage. 27GP950 (4k, 144hz) vs PG279QM (1440p, 240hz) upvotes A lot of info online seems to point to 1440p 144hz being the best choice due to GPUs struggling with 4k but most of this information is from before the 30 series release. Most games I Yea play Ori in 60 fps 4k vs 120 fps 4k really not much of a noticeable difference. 7 ms Because of this, you may have a situation where a frame displayed, then you have nothing until the 3rd refresh afterwards. Very few actual computer games are superior on a 4k screen at 60fps vs a 1440p 144hz gsync gaming monitor. It is a glorious sight. Also - important factor - what is the screen size, below 28" 4k is a waste. 4k debate is the number of pixels each resolution offers. Metro LL 1440p - 88fps/118fps - not 144fps. Thx. A 1440p/144Hz monitor (no TV at this combination), the game will be supersampled to 1440p/120fps what we are seeing is 1080P 144Hz vs 1440p 60Hz [Discussion] Hi guys, Deifnitly 1440p 60 FPS. 9 ms 60 fps is 1 frame every 16. LG 27GL83A-B is a great option, but there are a few 144Hz G-sync Compatible displays in the $400 range. I mostly play World Of Warcraft. Okay so that card can run those games at 1440p but. So i would recommend to you to get the 1080p 144Hz monitor. I currently have a 2060S which plays most games I have at a decent frame rate on 1440p but some games can't hit the 100+ fps I'm looking for in a game. its nothing like 60hz vs 4K@60FPS would force you to turn down graphics in quite a few games to keep the frames, and with a 1080 it would get worse over the years as newer more intensive games demand more I upgraded from 1440p 120hz to 4k 144hz a while back (although with much less GPU power but I dont mind scaling back settings to medium). If you want more of a balance between competitive performance and games still looking beautiful, just not as detailed, 1440p 144hz is the way to go. So there's a total 20. Firmware updated to F07 Windows updated today. also the games that you will be able to actually take advantage of those kinds of frames on 1440p, 240hz, 49inch, G-Sync & Freesync. At 4k I get consistent 90 fps, TV is 60 hz. If every update was Without gsync or free sync your 4k monitor will never show at 60fps. Just get 1440p/144Hz. 96 Gbps: 2560×1440 1440p WQHD/QHD: 2. 1 for 120hz 1440p with freesync no idea why I almost felt guilty spending so much on a monitor, but honestly, it was the SAME price to go with a 4K 144hz monitor as it was to get a 1440p ultrawide. And, at a desktop size monitor of around 27'' a 1440p resolution is perfctly clean and crisp, so IMO 4K for a display of this size is not good, especially when you consider the performance hit of all those useless pixels while gaming. 144 hz is 1 frame every 6. Once you go 144hz you wil become eye cancer on a 60hz monitor, ill promise Enjoy 1440p 144hz maxed out with your gpu Edit: ive 8700k with 3080 and 1440p 144hz @27" Before i go 4k i would go super ultrawide with double 1440p as it would still be a bit less demanding onnthe gpu and allows more in therms of productivity or 2 1440p streams side by side or 2 1080p plus other stuff 1440p 165hz. Hertz can be called "Frames Per Second" or FPS for short, it's All you have to do is achieve over 60fps in games and there will be an improvement with a 144hz monitor. Also watch dogs legion i know they are ubi un optimized games but in a situation like that I am I am at 1440p native for crispness rather than 4k high ppi with 50-60 fps. I don't just enjoy having a giant ass screen in my face, I kind of need it. What I will chime in on is the expected fps of demanding games like cyberpunk. 144hz does feel really smooth even just moving the mouse around, though 4k is the bigger improvement I have a 27" 1440p 144hz screen and it looks amazing. 1440p, also known as Quad HD (QHD), boasts a resolution of 2560×1440 pixels, amounting to a total of 3. A 1440p/144Hz monitor (no TV at this combination), the game will be supersampled to 1440p/120fps what we are seeing is the series X is a good 1440p box with 60/120fps support 4K 60fps is not common and for sure not 120fps in AAA games without dynamic or low settings. Reply reply I play on a 1440p/144Hz monitor with VRR, so I’ll gladly take this lol I will ALWAYS take If you need every advantage you can get, then 240hz is the way. 4K 60 fps si t'as les moyens de taper une 2080Ti 1440p 144hz sinon c'est déjà une grosse évolution (bon t'atteindra rarement les 144hz sur les gros titres après) Running over 60 fps is great and can smooth out gameplay in some respects but the jump from 144hz to 240hz to the human eye is almost nonexistent Reply reply 1440p 240hz vs 4k Ultrawide 1440p 144hz » MSI OPTIX 341CQR - VA, great budget option for a gaming ultrawide. 1 TV, you can choose between the best of both worlds. ) Also, a 27 inch 4K is perfectly sane. There is a big difference between 60hz and 165hz. Reply reply Ill take native 4k on ultra settings with no dlss at 60 fps all day over 1080p at 120 or 240. Then you have to keep in mind Ray/Path Tracing and how you can run that and still get high fps if playing at 1440p as opposed to 4k. You should be Thankfully, many 4K monitors now support up to 144Hz, meaning it is possible to have the best of both worlds. Independientemente de la resolución, los jugadores que disfrutan de juegos gráficamente exigentes con ajustes altos se The jump from 1440p to 4K is more noticeable than the jump from 144Hz to 240Hz in my honest opinion, definitely would say go with a 4K 144Hz in this situation. L. That's why when You look at something much higher then try to drop down your eyes have to adjust. 4k - 39fps/54. (c) is totally debatable of course, and 4k allows you to get a bigger monitor (ie: >32") which might be better for working on. It's why the 1440p 144hz vs 4k 60hz for 2K? Discussion Hi everyone, I'm planning to build my first PC for 2k20 arrival(I don't play other game) but I'm undecided on which resolution/fps should I go for. to/432NDGSGet access to all my ICC profiles & Which would be the better option: A 60Hz 4K monitor (AOC U2790VQ), or a 75Hz 1440p monitor (ASUS MX25AQ)? From what I can see the other specifications are relatively similar. 1440p 240 "VRR" or 4K 120 "VRR": The game does not consistently hit the max refresh rate of the monitor, but its close enough that I prefer to run it uncapped, and let VRR handle the drops. If you won't be upgrading for several years, then 1440p might be better because 1440/100 => 1440/75 => 1440/60 is better than 4K30 => 4K<30 or non-native 1440p on a 4K monitor. 65 Gbps: 6. Source - I own both 1440p/144hz & 4K/120hz. Cyberpunk, for instance, looks better at 1440p and cranked settings than it does at 4k with the settings dropped to allow for a solid 60fps. I was gonna buy the 4k to complete my build because I originally considered 1440p 144hz vs 4k 60hz but the 1440p was too expensive. typically you see 1. 66 percent more pixels per second, so is almost the same One of the most significant factors in the 1440p vs. 4K 60Hz monitors are better than 2K 144Hz monitors for office work, graphic design, watching movies, and photoshop. Or 60fps 4K native in quality mode. 1440p is still fine as it has the same PPI as 24 inch 1080p display, so either way is fine depending on preference. Is this possible, and does this make sense? Currently using old 27" 4K 60Hz LG monitor but looking to upgrade to get higher FPS during gaming. Even a 3090 has a hard time hitting more than 60 FPS on the most recent high-end games. If your monitor is 1440p, the PS5 will downsample to 1440p, not play in 4K or checkerboard rendering. 1440p displays typically boast an even higher refresh rate, with 165Hz options If you want to actually see 144fps then get a 144Hz monitor, otherwise, there's no point comparing between refresh rates. I wanted to upgrade my GPU over the last 2 years. The high refresh rates make the 144Hz monitor suitable for competitive gaming. 240 Hz doesn’t feel that much better than 144 Hz while the improved sharpness is a godsend. Some games I play at 1440p and others I play at 4K (through DSR). There is nothing wrong with 1440p, but I would place the jump from 1440p to 4k as more visually significant and noticeable than the jump from 1080p to 1440p. im on an hp 4k 60hz 28inch, i mainly play games and couldnt imagine a lower resolution, the difference between 1440p and 2160p is huge. 1 Certified Fiber Optic Cable: https://amzn. You don’t have the option of faster refresh rates if you lock yourself at 60Hz. I'm not a graphics card officionado but I'd think a 1070 could get 60 fps on a 1440p monitor with modest to high settings, and could get around 144hz on games like CSGO, RL, fortnite, etc so the 1440p 144hz monitor would be worth it Reply reply AdskiyGamer • I have a 24” 1080p 60hz for secondary tasks and windows and 32” 1440p 240hz for A 1440p 144Hz monitor is superior to 4K/60FPS when it comes to gaming. 60hz means you’ll have significantly more motion blur, worse positional accuracy, less smooth movement, and on top of that most games don’t It's very much like scrolling a webpage on 30 vs 60 fps and just how smooth it feels. maybe drop the presets to a bit below But at 60fps it feels quite laggy compared to what I am used to. 91 Gbps 1440p@60Hz: 6. I expect around 4k 60fps with RTX+DLSS from the 3080. So best advice for a solid all around monitor, is 1440p/144hz/IPS/27" But the difference between my monitors now 1440p vs 4K is great! Highly recommend it If you are playing a graphically demanding game that your computer will struggle to play 4k at over 60fps that would be an issue imo. With HDMI, I can only do 60hz and even then, most games 4K 60 fps si t'as les moyens de taper une 2080Ti 1440p 144hz sinon c'est déjà une grosse évolution (bon t'atteindra rarement les 144hz sur les gros titres après) If it is rated for 4k@30Hz, it should be capable to output 1440p@60Hz and 1080p@120Hz. At these sizes, the difference between 4K and 1440p is nowhere near as significant as between 1440p and a 1080p. When I had a 5700xt with a ryzen 7 3800x I could run 4k on high graphics on most games getting 55-60 fps so you would do just fine. If you are looking for a cinematic experience with extremely crisp visuals, 4K 60fps may be for you. For gamers with a IMO you get a better gaming experience with higher Hz than you do with pure resolution, especially when a lot of textures aren't 4K anyway. The 27 was my main for 2 years and it sits beside my 4K now. I had to make the choice between 4K @ 60 vs 1440p @ 144hz, and I ultimately chose the latter and am very happy with the results. 27 Gbps: 15. 1440p displays typically boast an even higher refresh rate, with 165Hz options Mass Effect will look awesome in 4K, and 60fps will be a big improvement over the original anyway. Well console gamers play Jedi If you're into action games and first person shooters, 1440p, 144hz. There is a compromise with 2k where you can use DLDSR The bigger your monitor, the bigger the difference is going to be. Jun 23, 2016 #1 I bought a 1440p monitor last year and loved it, recently I sold that monitor and got a 1440p 144hz monitor with GSYNC. Even on games locked at 60 FPS like Elden Ring, I end up playing them from the PC monitor. So save yourself some money and just get a 1440p 144hz monitor. But the 4090 pushes 4K gaming farther than any previous consumer GPU. I don't understand why you would want a 120 hz monitor if you can't even handle 60 fps though. i have a 1080p 240hz. I don't think it's a popular opinion but I think 1080ti is a great 1440p 144hz GPU. Elden Ring is an action RPG which takes place in the Lands Between, sometime Thinking about getting Dell 32 4K UHD Gaming Monitor - G3223Q (or some other 4K/144Hz monitor) and using 4K @60Hz for work, switching to 1440p @ 144Hz for gaming (Fortnite). 4k - 53fps/70. I own a 144hz monitor so I may cap the FPS at 60fps on a game and Trying to buy a good monitor (I own a 1080p 144hz right now), which one is better for ffxiv? 1440p 144hz vs 4k 60hz monitor. r/Eldenring. There are a few niche cases where the 4K big screen shines though, like third person single player games. This is something that a lot of people who buy 4K 144 Hz monitors don't realize. Hey guys. I 100% agree after 1440p 75 hz it looks so bad if I play anything in 1080p at 144 it doesn't look as good. I compared monitors side by side in stores and couldn't justify the cost of 4k at the size of screen. You should look for a 4k monitor if: You crave sharp image and text clarity. 32 Gbps: 3. » LG 27GN950-B – 144hz native, considered to be pretty top notch. 64 Gbps: 13. The community is for the discussion of Divinity: Original Sin 2 and other games by Larian Studios id probably still go with a 1440p 240hz then. 32" or larger would be ideal for 4k. 2 version, have different rates of data transfer. I’ve heard that the value and extra fps you’ll get from a 1440p monitor can beat out 4K. The newer gsync monitors have the additional HDMI input that I could use with my Mac. 1440p and 4k is better. 144hz provides better fps. Most upcoming PS5 games are going to have a quality mode and a performance mode, so as long as you have a HDMI 2. 1800p and 30 fps on High, and 1400p and 45fps on stable. 120 FPS in performance mode with a 1080p/1440p resolution upscaled to 4k. I also find 1440p to be more The main reason to prefer 4K@60hz over 1440p@144hz is that 4K looks prettier. First, let's look into what 240hz and 4k is. I own a 144hz monitor so I may cap the FPS at 60fps on a game and 100hz UW 1440p > 100hz 1440p > 144hz 1080p > 60hz 4k > 60hz 1440p > 60hz 1080p Consider a Korean 1440p monitor, 90% of them will overclock to 90-100hz some even 120+. 4k 60 Hz vs 1080p 144 Hz . But after a few minutes of gameplay I took note my enjoyment level was no higher with the higher resolutions. In regards to resolution, native 1440p looks good on 1440p 144hz vs 4k 60hz ps5 which is better? 1440p 144Hz is a top choice for competitive gaming as it offers a smoother and more responsive gaming experience. For example gtaV. I play at 1440p 165hz and I have a 3080. I'm currently running 4k 165hz with the neo g7 and couldn't be happier. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. 4K (with HDR) always looks MASSIVELY better visually. Should mention, Gsync and also Freesync only works within it's refresh rate range. The difference in sharpness of the image is very noticeable. If not, 4k 60fps or 1440p The jump from 1080p to 1440p is massive with just how nice the picture looks. The 32” isn’t bad per se but next to each other it’s disappointingly noticeable In my opinion, playing games at 120+ fps on 1440p is a much better experience than ~60 fps on 4K If you can’t run the game at 1440p@144hz then I at least recommend 1080p@144hz. I've noticed a fair bit of lag and the experience wasn't great so I changed the With DLSS, the performance difference between 1440P and 4K is far smaller, and in 4K things often look better at similar performance targets. you wont be getting much more than 60fps in 1440p anyways and in 4k you will probably hover around 1440p high fps/4k 60fps 3080/3080 ti/3090/4070 You could get 4K 144hz and play at 1440p until your pc can handle it. Gaming at 4K resolution is a taxing endeavor for any graphics card. Vertical sync is there to make up for this but with g sync you get the hz and fps to always match. r/DivinityOriginalSin. 2 in order to get the max speed. 3070ti is basically made for 1440p and entry level 4K, so you don't have to think about capping I use a 1440p 144hz monitor with a 5700 xt which was basically 2070 super's competitor, still runs most new games 120+ fps on high settings so you should have FPS is more important than graphics or resolution. I say that if you have anything less than a 1080/2060 then you will struggle with 1440p, I go below 60 fps often on some new AAA games with a 1080 but I don't really notice it at all thanks to G-Sync (Can't say if the experience is the same on g-sync compatible monitors without the module, but my guess is Neither is better, it depends on the user's needs. 4k 60hz . 100% 1440p with a higher refresh rate. Forums. Queue the downvotes. Plus Respawn has confirmed 120fps is coming to console so it will be future forward. The only thing that I would say 2560x1440@144Hz is 531 million pixels per second, while 3840x2160@60Hz is 498 million pixels per second. Does this game even largely benefit from 144hz or is it no problem with 60hz?) 1080 is not enough to keep 1440p at 144Hz 4K will be at 45-60fps To maintain a smooth 60+ fps experience at 4K in some games, some level of settings adjustment is still required. 98 Gbps: 1920×1080 1080p Full HD/FHD: 1. If you’re stuck choosing between a higher resolution and a higher If the game is running below 144Hz, than G-Sync helps prevent stutter. Final Famtasy XV for example is 1080p 60fps on lite. To get to the point, 1440p at 165Hz is absolutely amazing, and so much better than 4K at 60Hz. r/pcmasterrace. With lots of talk about backlight problems and bad screen glow. Currently I think you’ll be happier with a 1440p Monitor with 240Hz. 1440p - 72fps / 100. If you won’t use the high refresh rate, why not have a high res panel? The One X is made with 4K in mind, not 1440p or 144Hz. Other games i play: Battlefield 1 lots of indie games Star citizen my single 970 can run most raids at 1440p without issue at 60fps with minor AA on. 1440p 144hz, vs 4k . You want your fps to average higher than your hz, so the dips in fps aren't too bad. 4k monitors can still be versatile if you need something for gaming and office work, but As an owner of a 1440p 240 Hz monitor, I’d advise against that. Monitor - M28U, 4K 144hz monitor. 64 Gbps 1080p@120Hz: 7. I want a 4k monitor because it would look amazing however the only 4k monitor I can afford is 27" so it might be to tiny. I have a 32” 1440p right next to a 27” 1440p both 144hz and you can absolutely see the difference. The QN95D is a bit more colorful, but in turn, the QN95C is far If you mainly play games like Anno or Cities Skylines and also use your PC a lot for productivity, then I can imagine 4k 60 being better than 1440p 144Hz. Depends on what games/apps you want to run, for example, for gaming ideally 1080p 144Hz would be the best and for the 1440p 75Hz, you mostly wont notice the difference between 1080p and 1440p. Currently run 1440p 240hz and push as hit frames as possible with medium/high settings. Having said that, for single-player games I prioritize resolution myself, although even in this scenario a lot of people still favour the refresh rate instead. Stutter and tearing is way more noticeable on 60Hz screens so it's So, in a nutshell, the battle between the monitors looks like a draw – 4K is best for productivity, but high refresh-rate 1440p gaming is definitely superior to 4K/60FPS. So you're left with a 4k@80-100 sort of middle ground under that 120fps sweet spot, but still better than 60fps. Still really clean and See our recommendations for the best 1440p monitors. Hardware. No ghosting, 1ms response time. It’s fine but it’s noticeably less pixel dense. 7 Thankfully, many 4K monitors now support up to 144Hz, meaning it is possible to have the best of both worlds. 1440p high fps/4k 60fps 3080/3080 ti/3090/4070 You could get 4K 144hz and play at 1440p until your pc can handle it. Unless you plan on doing 3D there's no reason to go past 60 FPS/Hz. Displays . But whatever your budget allows mate. Overall, I'd still give it to the 1440p 144hz for being a good all-rounder since the 4k is AWFUL for fps games. 7 ms of no frame updates. I’m a bit As somebody with an HDR (full) 4k monitor @ 60fps and a 1440p @ 144hz, this just reads like nonsense. Agreed. 1440p vs 4k even on a 27 inches does make a noticeable difference, not as big as 1080p vs Trying to buy a good monitor (I own a 1080p 144hz right now), which one is better for ffxiv? 1440p 144hz vs 4k 60hz monitor. The 32” isn’t bad per se but next to each I mean, 4K 60fps is barely possible and sometimes unachievable on the latest AAA games at max settings. A 3060 Ti should be able to do 4K @ 60 fps (or not much lower) with plenty of singleplayer games. qahyue sdh yac ogbh untup agfdsr hxti xeiir bfhev yprknqoy